• It has an two process they are reactive and proactive. • These process are performed to transferring the data from one node to another without any data loss. • And the malicious node do not reply any information, then in this proposed work to reduce the malicious node and increase the efficiency of data, reduce data loss. • CBDS is able to achieve proactive detection in the initial stage and then change into reactive response in the later stage. The drawbacks of BFTR is that malicious nodes may still exist in the new chosen route, and this scheme is prone to repeated route discovery processes, which may lead to significant routing overhead. • The destination it is found that the packet delivery ratio significantly falls to the threshold • The detection scheme would be triggered again to detect for continuous maintenance and real-time reaction efficiency. • It not efficient for data transfering from one node to another and it does not have any security process. • Then the malicious node do not reply any acknowledgement data from the source node.